My post Guilty until proven innocent? on January 8, 2014 described how the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Mumbai had used “emergency powers” to suspend Dr. Neeraj Hatekar after Dr. Hatekar was part of a press conference, in which he reported the alleged mismanagement at the varsity and the deterioration of the university’s academic status.
On January 20, 2014, DNA reported that, after a 10-hour long meeting of the management council starting on Saturday afternoon and ending in the early hours of Sunday, January 19, 2014, the University of Mumbai has reinstated Dr. Hatekar and has ordered an inquiry by a retired High Court judge into Hatekar’s conduct and the issues raised by him.
The report states that the one-member fact-finding committee reported that all 16 charges levelled by Hatekar bear no fact. However, a press release issued by the university said, “None of the 16 charges levelled by Hatekar bears any fact. However, for the welfare of the students and also considering the public sentiments, the management council recommended that his suspension be revoked.”
What happened between Dr. Hatekar’s suspension and his reinstatement?
According to this NDTV report, Dr. Hatekar’s students protested vehemently against his suspension. They also attended classes conducted by him on the road outside the university.
DNA reports that Dr. Hatekar challenged the varsity’s decision in the Bombay High Court, citing it “illegal” as the varsity neither issued a show-cause notice nor conducted any inquiry before suspending him.
In an interview to DNA, Dr. Hatekar has stated that there was a signature campaign from 125 villages of Maharashtra in his support, and that Jagdish Bhagwati, Ramchandra Guha and teachers from other universities appealed for him on their own.
According to the NDTV report, Mumbai University Chancellor and Maharashtra Governor asked the Vice Chancellor to review the suspension order.
Interestingly, in the interview to DNA, Dr. Hatekar has stated that some politicians did come to him, but he told them their help was not needed. He has also stated that he has no intention of joining politics. He took up the whole matter because, “Public universities are run from tax payer’s money; I am also a tax payer and it’s my duty to raise a voice if I find any wrongdoing.”
None of the reports state this, but we can be certain that, given the vindictive and arbitrary manner of the suspension, attempts would have been made to find if any allegations of wrongdoing or misconduct of any sort could be made against Dr. Hatekar to pressurize him into softening his stand, and that these attempts met with no success.
Dr. Neeraj Hatekar, a non-political common person with a clean record, has been fighting hard for a just cause that he believes in. He has received strong support from many other non-political common persons, some of whom are not directly connected to the cause. He was offered support from politicians, but did not take it. He has won the first round of the battle. This is truly heartening!
Since the inquiry will be conducted by a retired High Court judge, we can probably expect that justice will be done in this matter. Let us hope for the best.
Proactive Indian 
Prof. Hatekar’s is the fitest case to test the efficacy of the much touted Whistle Blower policy.
How does an in-house person arrive at any conclusion for the Governing Council to spend 10 hours to discuss it when the Chancellor appoints a retired judge to enquiry into the matter in its entirety?
The Bombay University has lost all its credibility after the fake degrees and leaked papers.
Yes, we must wait for the inquiry report and further developments.
yup.. hoping for the best is what we can do …
In this case, perhaps, there’s not much we can do apart from hoping for the best.
However, as Dr. Hatekar has said, each one of us must remember that “it’s my duty to raise a voice if I find any wrongdoing.”
Interesting. What a nice example this makes!
What I’ve liked most is the fact that, from all available reports, Dr. Hatekar, the students and all others supporting him have conducted themselves in a very civilised way. They have been fighting hard, but fighting clean!
This has been a great case study so far. Let’s watch the future developments.
This has been an interesting case. The professor and his students have maintained their composure. He has refused all political mileage. Let us see the transparency of the findings
Yes, they have conducted themselves very well so far. There seems to be no hidden agenda, political or otherwise. We have to wait for the inquiry report and further developments.
Wish we have more of his tribe around.
Each one of us can be like him! As he said, “it’s my duty to raise a voice if I find any wrongdoing.”